GP laughter in lifestyle behaviour consultations: A conversation analytical study of general practice

Objective: This study investigates laughter by General Practitioners (GPs) in response to patient laughter in lifestyle behaviour consultations.Method: We examined video-recorded consultations involving 44 patients of four GPs in Australia. After identifying 33 cases of patient laughter, we examined whether GPs laughed in response. We used Conversation Analysis to explore the appropriateness of GP laughter and non-laughter by investigating the talk before and after the occurrence of patient laughter.Results: GP reciprocal laughter was found in thirteen occasions when patients unsolicitedly mentioned their behaviours, laughed and displayed their evaluative stances (whether the behaviours were positive or negative). On twenty occasions, patients laughed in response to GP enquiries, which worked to problematise particular behaviours. In this context, patient laughter was not usually reciprocated (19/20 cases) because reciprocal laughter may risk being interpreted as laughing at the patient, as evidenced by one deviant case.Conclusion: GP reciprocal laughter may be problematic when the behaviour issues are raised by GPs and patients' evaluative stances regarding their behaviour have not yet been revealed. Practice implications: To decide when it is appropriate to reciprocate laughter, GPs should consider the contexts that lead to patient laughter and patients' evaluative stances.

Automated summary

This study examines the response of General Practitioners (GPs) to patient laughter in lifestyle behaviour consultations. The study finds that GPs reciprocate laughter when patients mention their behaviors and display evaluative stances. However, when patient laughter is in response to GP enquiries, laughter is usually not reciprocated.