4.5 Article

Prognostic evaluation of tumour budding in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Evidenced by CD44 expression as a cancer stem cell marker

期刊

PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
卷 251, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154883

关键词

Oral squamous cell carcinoma; Tumor budding; Cancer stem cells; CD44; Immunohistochemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor budding and CD44 expression are of prognostic significance in OSCC.
Objectives: Tumor budding is a sign of invasion and early step for metastasis of many cancers including oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Evidences suggest the presence of cancer stem cells in tumor buds. CD44 has been reported in tumor growth and metastasis as a cancer stem cell marker in OSCC. The study aims to highlight the prognostic significance of tumor budding in association with CD44 expression as a cancer stem cell marker in OSCC.Methods: A total of 60 radical neck dissection specimens of OSCC with and without lymph node metastasis were included in the study. The sections were evaluated for TB [Tumor Budding] in H&E and CD44 expression immunohistochemically. OSCC cases were then correlated with clinicopathologic and histomorphologic parameters such as age, gender, habit, site, staging, grading, recurrence, depth of invasion, pattern of invasion, and survival outcomes. Comparison of prognosis and CD44 expression were carried out by statistical methods.Results: A high TB score was significantly correlated with grading (p = 0.037), POI [Pattern of invasion] (0.029), overall survival (p = 0.047). CD44 over expression showed strong correlations with POI (1HPF:p = 0.037;10HPF:p = 0.027), grading (p = 0.037), and overall survival (p = 0.047). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed overall survival advantage for LTB [Low TB] (85 %) with OSCC compare to HTB [High TB] (75 %) for > 36 months.Conclusion: Assessment of TB is effective in predicting prognosis of OSCC. Although CD44 expression has demonstrated strong prognostic influence, there were significant differences in its expression with the parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据