4.5 Article

Antimicrobial resistance and its detection in Staphylococcus saprophyticus urinary isolates

期刊

PATHOLOGY
卷 55, 期 7, 页码 1013-1016

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2023.07.006

关键词

Antibiotic resistance; Australia; methicillin resistance; Staphylococcus saprophyticus; urine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the antibiotic susceptibility of clinical Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolates from urine specimens collected in Melbourne, Australia. The findings showed that empiric antibiotic recommendations for treatment of urinary S. saprophyticus remain appropriate.
The aim of this study was to describe the antibiotic susceptibility of clinical Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolates collected prospectively from urine specimens over a 2 month period from September to October 2022 at a single centre in Melbourne, Australia. Species identification was performed by MALDI-TOF MS. All isolates underwent phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility testing by disc diffusion using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines and VITEK2, and mecA polymerase chain reaction. A total of 302 S. saprophyticus isolates from 298 patients were included in this study. Most specimens (91.1%) were referred by community general practitioners from non hospitalised patients. Antimicrobial resistance to non-blactam antibiotics was uncommon; trimethoprim susceptibility was 97%; trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 98%; nitrofurantoin, 100%; and ciprofloxacin, 100% (100% ciprofloxacin susceptible, increased exposure by EUCAST breakpoints). Methicillin resistance (by mecA detection) was the most common form of urinary antibiotic resistance at 5.6%. VITEK2 susceptibility testing for methicillin resistance had a poor specificity of 61.8% (95% CI 55.8-67.4%) compared to mecA detection. These findings indicate that empiric antibiotic recommendations of trimethoprim, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and nitrofurantoin for treatment of urinary S. saprophyticus remain appropriate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据