期刊
PARTICUOLOGY
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 48-63出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2022.12.018
关键词
Coarse-graining; Discrete element method; Computational fluid dynamics; CFD-DEM; Positron emission particle tracking (PEPT); Bubbling fluidised bed
Computational Fluid Dynamics coupled with Discrete Element Method (CFD-DEM) is a commonly used numerical method for gas-solid flow modeling. Coarse-graining (CG) approaches can reduce the number of particles while maintaining system dynamics. This paper evaluates three typical CG methods for simulating a bubbling fluidized bed and finds that the CG simulation fails when the size ratio between the chamber and particles decreases to approximately 20. It also shows that the specific CG approach for interparticle contact parameters does not substantially affect the simulation results across a wide range of CG factors.
Computational Fluid Dynamics coupled with Discrete Element Method (CFD-DEM) is a commonly used numerical method to model gas-solid flow in fluidised beds and other multiphase systems. A significant limitation of CFD-DEM is the feasibility of the realistic simulation of large numbers of particles. Coarse-graining (CG) approaches, through which groups of multiple individual particles are represented by single, larger particles, can substantially reduce the total number of particles while maintaining similar system dynamics. As these three CG models have not previously been compared, there remains some debate, however, about the best practice in the application of CG in CFD-DEM simulations. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of three typical CG methods based on simulations of a bubbling fluidised bed. This is achieved through the use of a numerical validation framework, which makes full use of the high-resolution 3D positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) measurements to rigorously validate the outputs of CFD-DEM simulations conducted using various different coarse-graining models, and various different degrees of coarse-graining. The particle flow behaviours in terms of the particle occupancy field, velocity field, circulation time, and bubble size and velocity, are comprehensively analysed. It is shown that the CG simulation starts to fail when the size ratio between the bed chamber and the particles decreases to approximately 20. It is also observed, somewhat surprisingly, that the specific CG approach applied to interparticle contact parameters does not have a substantial effect on the simulation results for the bubbling bed simulations across a wide range of CG factors.(c) 2023 Chinese Society of Particuology and Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据