4.8 Article

SorCS2 is required for BDNF-dependent plasticity in the hippocampus

期刊

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
卷 21, 期 12, 页码 1740-1751

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mp.2016.108

关键词

-

资金

  1. Lundbeck Foundation
  2. Rochester Epidemiology Project [R01 AG034676]
  3. Danish Agency for Science Technology and Innovation (DAGMAR)
  4. Danish Council for Independent Research Sapere Aude starting grant [DFF 4183-00604]
  5. Lundbeck Foundation [R198-2015-168, R108-2012-10957] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SorCS2 is a member of the Vps10p-domain receptor gene family receptors with critical roles in the control of neuronal viability and function. Several genetic studies have suggested SORCS2 to confer risk of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and attention deficithyperactivity disorder. Here we report that hippocampal N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity is eliminated in SorCS2-deficient mice. This defect was traced to the ability of SorCS2 to form complexes with the neurotrophin receptor p75(NTR), required for pro-brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) to induce long-term depression, and with the BDNF receptor tyrosine kinase TrkB to elicit long-term potentiation. Although the interaction with p75(NTR) was static, SorCS2 bound to TrkB in an activitydependent manner to facilitate its translocation to postsynaptic densities for synaptic tagging and maintenance of synaptic potentiation. Neurons lacking SorCS2 failed to respond to BDNF by TrkB autophosphorylation, and activation of downstream signaling cascades, impacting neurite outgrowth and spine formation. Accordingly, Sorcs2(-/-) mice displayed impaired formation of long-term memory, increased risk taking and stimulus seeking behavior, enhanced susceptibility to stress and impaired prepulse inhibition. Our results identify SorCS2 as an indispensable coreceptor for p75(NTR) and TrkB in hippocampal neurons and suggest SORCS2 as the link between proBDNF/BDNF signaling and mental disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据