4.6 Article

Lactobacillus fermentum attenuates the alveolar bone loss in ligature-induced periodontitis in mice

期刊

ORAL DISEASES
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/odi.14739

关键词

alveolar bone loss; cytokine; periodontitis; probiotics; X-ray microtomography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that Lactobacillus fermentum BELF11 can inhibit alveolar bone loss and the progression of periodontitis by regulating the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This suggests that Lactobacillus fermentum BELF11 may be a potential adjunctive therapy in periodontal treatment.
ObjectiveThis study investigated the effects of Lactobacillus fermentum BELF11 on periodontitis in mice (LIP).MethodsSixty mice were randomly assigned to a control group (CTL), LIP/PBS group (LIP and PBS applied), or LIP/BELF11 group (LIP and L. fermentum BELF11 applied). For 14 days, PBS or L. fermentum BELF11 was applied twice daily to the mice in the LIP/PBS or LIP/BELF11 group, respectively. After 14 days, radiographic, histological, and pro-inflammatory cytokine assessments were conducted.ResultsThe LIP/PBS and LIP/BELF11 groups demonstrated greater alveolar bone loss than the CTL group (p < 0.05). The LIP/BELF11 group showed significantly reduced alveolar bone loss on the mesial side compared to the LIP/PBS group. Histologically, the LIP/BELF11 group showed consistent patterns of connective tissue fiber arrangement, lower levels of inflammatory infiltration, less alveolar bone loss, and higher alveolar bone density than the LIP/PBS group, despite showing more signs of destruction than the CTL group. The LIP/BELF11 group also exhibited significantly lower levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines than the LIP/PBS group.ConclusionsL. fermentum BELF11 inhibits alveolar bone loss and periodontitis progression by regulating pro-inflammatory cytokine production. These findings suggest that L. fermentum BELF11 may be a potential adjunctive therapy in periodontal treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据