4.5 Article

Sinorhizobium fredii HH103 Invades Lotus burttii by Crack Entry in a Nod Factor-and Surface Polysaccharide-Dependent Manner

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS
卷 29, 期 12, 页码 925-937

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-09-16-0195-R

关键词

-

资金

  1. Andalusia government [P11-CVI-7500]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [BIO2011-30229-C01]
  3. Ph.D. grant from VPPI of University of Seville
  4. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF79]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sinorhizobium fredii HH103-Ri(r), a broad host range rhizobial strain, induces nitrogen-fixing nodules in Lotus burttii but ineffective nodules in L. japonicus. Confocal microscopy studies showed that Mesorhizobium loll MAFF303099 and S. fredii HH103-Rif(r) invade L. burttii roots through infection threads or epidermal cracks, respectively. Infection threads in root hairs were not observed in L. burttii plants inoculated with S. fredii HH103-Rif(r). A S. fredii HH103-Rif(r) nodA mutant failed to nodulate L. burtth, demonstrating that Nod factors are strictly necessary for this crack-entry mode, and a noeL mutant was also severely impaired in L. burttii nodulation, indicating that the presence of fucosyl residues in the Nod factor is symbiotically relevant. However, significant symbiotic impacts due to the absence of methylation or to acetylation of the fucosyl residue were not detected. In contrast S. fredii HH103-Rif(r) mutants showing lipopolysaccharide alterations had reduced symbiotic capacity, while mutants affected in production of either exopolysaccharides, capsular polysaccharides, or both were not impaired in nodulation. Mutants unable to produce cyclic glucans and purine or pyrimidine auxotrophic mutants formed ineffective nodules with L. burttii. Flagellin-dependent bacterial mobility was not required for crack infection, since HH103-Rif(r) fla mutants nodulated L. burttii. None of the S. fredii HH103-Rif(r) surface-polysaccharide mutants gained effective nodulation with L. japonicus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据