4.7 Article

Powering performance prediction of a semi-displacement ship retrofitted with Hull Vane

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 286, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115561

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study predicts the powering performance of a semi-displacement ship, both without and with a Hull Vane (HV). The effect of the HV on the propulsion performance is investigated and a practical method is proposed as an engineering application to reduce the computation time. The study shows that HV not only decreases effective power by 11.41% but also increases the propulsive efficiency by 2.1%, which reduces the brake power by 14.61% in total at service speed.
This study predicts the powering performance of a semi-displacement ship, both without and with a Hull Vane (HV). HV is an energy-saving appendage fixed at the transom bottom of the ship's hull. Although the HV is commercially known as a successful resistance-reducing device, there are no studies in the literature examining its effect on propulsion performance in detail. In this study, the effect of the HV on the propulsion performance is investigated and a practical method is proposed as an engineering application to reduce the computation time. Initially, the idealized disc model based on Blade Element Theory (BET) is preferred to create a thrust force instead of using an entire physical propeller. The dynamic motions of the ship are reflected in the computational analysis. Subsequently, the sliding mesh technique, which models the exact propeller geometry, is implemented to calculate the self-propulsion characteristics without and with HV. These computations are achieved by employing a two-phase flow solver available in OpenFOAM. This study provides a significant demonstration to clarify the effect of HV on powering performance. It not only decreases effective power by 11.41% but also increases the propulsive efficiency by 2.1%, which reduces the brake power by 14.61% in total at service speed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据