4.7 Article

Wall-proximity effects on vortex-induced vibrations of a circular cylinder

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 287, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115874

关键词

Vortex shedding; Gap height; Wall proximity; Vortex-induced vibration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates vortex-induced vibrations of an elastically supported circular cylinder under wall interference. It is found that a smaller wall-cylinder gap height ratio increases the added mass, reduces the maximum vibration amplitude, and shortens the vibration range, while enhancing the quality factor of the vibration. Decreasing the gap height ratio significantly impacts the flow structure and vortex shedding modes.
Vortex-induced vibrations (VIV) of an elastically supported circular cylinder (of diameter D) undergoing a wall interference are investigated for a mass-damping ratio 0.31, Reynolds numbers 1.77 x 10(3)-1.24 x 10(4), and wall-cylinder gap height ratios e* = e/D = 0.1-1.6. Measurements of vibration responses and vortex shedding frequencies are done using a laser vibrometer and a hotwire anemometer, respectively, while particle image velocimetry techniques are employed to capture flow fields. This investigation aims to assimilate the effect of e* on vibration response, frequency response, VIV range, quality factor of VIV, added mass, added damping, lift force, and flow structure. A smaller e* is observed to increase the added mass, reduce the maximum vibration amplitude, and shorten the VIV range while enhancing the quality factor of VIV. The increase in added mass and the decrease in the maximum vibration amplitude in the VIV range are dramatic when e* is decreased from 0.6. Decreasing e* significantly impacts the flow structures and vortex shedding modes, resulting in intensified asymmetry in pressure distributions. The interference between the wall and the cylinder is further reflected by increasing time-mean lift forces and decreasing fluctuating lift forces with decreasing e* < 0.6.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据