4.7 Article

BMI, insulin sensitivity, and cognition in early type 2 diabetes: The Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study

期刊

OBESITY
卷 31, 期 7, 页码 1812-1824

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.23785

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the association between BMI, insulin sensitivity, and cognitive performance in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Higher BMI and lower insulin sensitivity were found to be related to better performance on memory and verbal fluency tests. However, when both BMI and insulin sensitivity were considered simultaneously, only higher BMI was related to cognitive performance. The causality and mechanisms for this association need to be further explored in future studies.
ObjectiveThis study explored the association of BMI and insulin sensitivity with cognitive performance in type 2 diabetes. MethodsA cross-sectional analysis of data from the baseline assessment of the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: a Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE) was conducted. BMI was used as a surrogate of adiposity and the Matsuda index as the measure of insulin sensitivity. Cognitive tests included the Spanish English Verbal Learning Test, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test, and the letter and animal fluency tests. ResultsCognitive assessments were completed by 5018 (99.4%) of 5047 participants aged 56.7 & PLUSMN; 10.0 years, of whom 36.4% were female. Higher BMI and lower insulin sensitivity were related to better performance on memory and verbal fluency tests. In models including BMI and insulin sensitivity simultaneously, only higher BMI was related to better cognitive performance. ConclusionsIn this study, higher BMI and lower insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes were cross-sectionally associated with better cognitive performance. However, only higher BMI was related to cognitive performance when both BMI and insulin sensitivity were considered simultaneously. The causality and mechanisms for this association need to be determined in future studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据