4.1 Article

Brain PET and SPECT imaging and quantification: a survey of the current status in the UK

期刊

NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 44, 期 10, 页码 834-842

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001736

关键词

brain; dementia; epilepsy; neuroimaging; Parkinson disease; PET; quantification; SPECT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the use of Brain SPECT and PET scans in the UK and explored drivers and barriers to using quantitative analysis through an online survey. The results showed variations across the UK, with high availability of DaTscan imaging and quantification and lower availability of other SPECT and PET scans.
ObjectivesWith disease-modifying therapies in development for neurological disorders, quantitative brain imaging techniques become increasingly relevant for objective early diagnosis and assessment of response to treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of Brain SPECT and PET scans in the UK and explore drivers and barriers to using quantitative analysis through an online survey.MethodsA web-based survey with 27 questions was used to capture a snapshot of brain imaging in the UK. The survey included multiple-choice questions assessing the availability and use of quantification for DaTscan, Perfusion SPECT, FDG PET and Amyloid PET. The survey results were reviewed and interpreted by a panel of imaging experts.ResultsForty-six unique responses were collected and analysed, with 84% of responses from brain imaging sites. Within these sites, 88% perform DaTscan, 50% Perfusion SPECT, 48% FDG PET, and 33% Amyloid PET, while a few sites use other PET tracers. Quantitative Brain analysis is used in 86% of sites performing DaTscans, 40% for Perfusion SPECT, 63% for FDG PET and 42% for Amyloid PET. Commercial tools are used more frequently than in-house software.ConclusionThe survey showed variations across the UK, with high availability of DaTscan imaging and quantification and lower availability of other SPECT and PET scans. The main drivers for quantification were improved reporting confidence and diagnostic accuracy, while the main barriers were a perception of a need for an appropriate database of healthy controls and a lack of training, time, and software availability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据