4.5 Article

Development of an outer-off-midplane lower hybrid wave launcher for improved core absorption in non-inductive plasma start-up on TST-2

期刊

NUCLEAR FUSION
卷 63, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/acf5ff

关键词

spherical tokamak; lower hybrid wave; non-inductive plasma start-up; traveling wave antenna

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new outer-off-midplane lower hybrid wave launcher was developed to improve core absorption in the TST-2 spherical tokamak. The experiment confirmed that the new launch scenario resulted in improved core electron heating and reduced LH wave driven fast electron losses, while also making it easier to maintain the optimal electron density level.
A new outer-off-midplane lower hybrid (LH) wave launcher was developed for improved core absorption in the TST-2 spherical tokamak. In the previously developed outer-midplane and top launch scenarios, plasma current was driven only very near the plasma edge (r/a > 0.7), resulting in limited driven current density. Strong thick-target x-ray radiation has also been observed for the top launch scenario, which indicated LH wave driven fast electron losses. The outer-off-midplane launch scenario was designed to drive current at the core (r/a similar to 0.5) at low phase velocity to suppress production of unnecessarily high energy electrons. In the non-inductive plasma start-up experiment with the new outer-off-midplane launch scenario, improved core electron heating was confirmed by the Thomson scattering diagnostic that showed the electron temperature was about twice as high as the previous two scenarios. Reduction of the LH wave driven fast electron losses was confirmed by the measured x-ray radiation intensity that was substantially lower than the top launch scenario. It was also easier to maintain the optimum level of the electron density compared to the outer-midplane launch scenario that indicated the undesired LH wave interactions with the scrape-off-layer plasma may have been reduced due to strong core absorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据