4.6 Article

Quantum nonlinear ac transport theory at low frequency

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
卷 25, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ad05a4

关键词

nonequilibrium Green's function formalism; quantum ac transport theory; nonlinear time-dependent current

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a quantum nonlinear theory based on nonequilibrium Green's function (NEGF) for studying time-dependent ac transport properties in the low frequency and nonlinear bias voltage regimes. The theory satisfies current conservation and gauge invariance and allows for evaluation of nonlinear ac current at arbitrarily large bias voltages under the low frequency limit. The paper also derives the expression of time-dependent current under the wide band limit and establishes the relation between nonlinear electrochemical capacitance and bias voltage, providing valuable insights into the dynamical properties of nanoelectronic devices.
Based on the nonequilibrium Green's function (NEGF), we develop a quantum nonlinear theory to study time-dependent ac transport properties in the low frequency and nonlinear bias voltage regimes. By expanding NEGF in terms of time to the linear order in Wigner representation, we can explicitly include the time-dependent self-consistent Coulomb interaction induced by external ac bias. Hence this theory automatically satisfies two basic requirements, i.e. current conservation and gauge invariance. Within this theory, the nonlinear ac current can be evaluated at arbitrarily large bias voltages under the low frequency limit. In addition, we obtain the expression of time-dependent current under the wide band limit and derive the relation between the nonlinear electrochemical capacitance and the bias voltage, which are very useful in predicting the dynamical properties of nanoelectronic devices. This quantum theory can be directly combined with density functional theory to investigate time-dependent ac transport from first-principles calculation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据