4.7 Article

Impact of stress on excitatory and inhibitory markers of adolescent cognitive critical period plasticity

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105378

关键词

Adolescence; Critical period; Plasticity; Stress; Excitation; Inhibition; GABA; Glutamate; PFC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adolescence is a critical period of neurocognitive development, with prolonged maturation of the prefrontal cortex and improvements in executive function. Stress experienced during adolescence can affect critical period plasticity mechanisms and cognitive outcomes, with acute stress enhancing cognition and excitatory processes in specific contexts, while chronic stress dampening excitatory and inhibitory processes and impairing cognition.
Adolescence is a time of significant neurocognitive development. Prolonged maturation of prefrontal cortex (PFC) through adolescence has been found to support improvements in executive function. Changes in excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms of critical period plasticity have been found to be present in the PFC through adolescence, suggesting that environment may have a greater effect on development during this time. Stress is one factor known to affect neurodevelopment increasing risk for psychopathology. However, less is known about how stress experienced during adolescence could affect adolescent-specific critical period plasticity mechanisms and cognitive outcomes. In this review, we synthesize findings from human and animal literatures looking at the experience of stress during adolescence on cognition and frontal excitatory and inhibitory neural activity. Studies indicate enhancing effects of acute stress on cognition and excitation within specific contexts, while chronic stress generally dampens excitatory and inhibitory processes and impairs cognition. We propose a model of how stress could affect frontal critical period plasticity, thus potentially altering neurodevelopmental trajectories that could lead to risk for psychopathology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据