4.4 Review

The ptotic tongue-imaging appearance and pathology localization along the course of the hypoglossal nerve

期刊

NEURORADIOLOGY
卷 65, 期 10, 页码 1425-1438

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-023-03204-y

关键词

MRI; Hypoglossal; Ptosis; Hypoglossal palsy; Denervation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CT and MRI findings of tongue ptosis and atrophy should raise suspicion for potential hypoglossal nerve pathology. However, these findings cannot accurately determine the exact location and cause of denervation. Understanding the anatomy of the hypoglossal nerve is essential in identifying underlying pathology that ranges from benign postoperative changes to life-threatening emergencies. This review provides key imaging findings, anatomical knowledge, imaging optimization, and various examples of pathology affecting the hypoglossal nerve to aid radiologists in detecting and diagnosing tongue ptosis and denervation.
CT and MRI findings of tongue ptosis and atrophy should alert radiologists to potential pathology along the course of the hypoglossal nerve (cranial nerve XII), a purely motor cranial nerve which supplies the intrinsic and extrinsic muscles of the tongue. While relatively specific for hypoglossal nerve pathology, these findings do not accurately localize the site or cause of denervation. A detailed understanding of the anatomic extent of the nerve, which crosses multiple anatomic spaces, is essential to identify possible underlying pathology, which ranges from benign postoperative changes to life-threatening medical emergencies. This review will describe key imaging findings of tongue denervation, segmental anatomy of the hypoglossal nerve, imaging optimization, and comprehensive imaging examples of diverse pathology which may affect the hypoglossal nerve. Armed with this knowledge, radiologists will increase their sensitivity for detection of pathology and provide clinically relevant differential diagnoses when faced with findings of tongue ptosis and denervation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据