4.7 Article

Effects of n-3 fatty acid supplements on glycemic traits in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients: A double-blind randomized controlled trial

期刊

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
卷 60, 期 10, 页码 2176-2184

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201600230

关键词

n-3 Fatty acids; Randomized controlled trial; Type 2 diabetes

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2015CB553604]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC: 81273054]
  3. Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [20120101110107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scope: To investigate the effects of n-3 fatty acid supplements, both marine and plant-based, on glycemic traits in Chinese type 2 diabetes patients. Method and results: In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, 185 recruited Chinese type 2 diabetes patients were randomized to either fish oil (FO, n = 63), flaxseed oil (FSO, n = 61), or corn oil group (served as control group, n = 61) for 180 days. The patients were asked to take corresponding oil capsules (four capsules/day), which totally provided 2 g/day of eicosapentaenoic acid + docosahexaenoic acid in FO group and 2.5 g/day of alpha-linolenic acid in FSO group. No group x time interaction was observed for homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, fasting insulin, or glucose. Significant group x time interaction (P = 0.035) was observed for glycated hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA1c), with HbA1c decreased in FO group compared with corn oil group (P = 0.037). We also found significant group x time interactions for lipid traits, including LDL cholesterol (P = 0.043), total cholesterol (P = 0.021), total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol (P = 0.009), and triacylglycerol (P = 0.003), with the lipid profiles improved in FO group. No significant effects of FSO on glycemic traits or blood lipids were observed. Conclusions: Marine n-3 PUFA supplements may improve glycemic control and lipid profiles among Chinese type 2 diabetic patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据