4.7 Article

Increase of circulating cholesterol in vitamin D deficiency is linked to reduced vitamin D receptor activity via the Insig-2/SREBP-2 pathway

期刊

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
卷 60, 期 4, 页码 798-809

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201500425

关键词

Cholesterol; Insig-2; Transcriptional activity; Vitamin D deficiency; Vitamin D receptor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81130049, 81573132]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [LC2015030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ScopeIndividuals deficient in vitamin D are more likely to have higher circulating cholesterol levels and cardiovascular diseases. However, the underlying mechanisms are still unclear. Methods and resultsA cross-sectional survey, animal study, and in vitro experiments were conducted to investigate the effect and mechanisms of vitamin D deficiency on endogenous cholesterol metabolism. We demonstrated that vitamin D deficiency was positively associated with an increase of total serum cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in northern Chinese individuals. The vitamin D deficiency-induced increase of cholesterol concentration was mainly due to enhanced cholesterol biosynthesis rather than reduced catabolism. Under vitamin D deficiency, the transcriptional activity of vitamin D receptor (VDR) was decreased, leading to the downregulation of insulin-induced gene-2 (Insig-2) expression and thus its inhibitory role on sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2 activation; 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase expression was accordingly increased. Vitamin D-3 was protective against vitamin D deficiency-induced cholesterol increase by maintaining the transcriptional activity of VDR and Insig-2 expression. ConclusionVitamin D deficiency is associated with the increase of circulating cholesterol in the people of northern China by enhancing hepatic cholesterol biosynthesis, which was linked to the reduction of transcriptional activity of VDR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据