Sex difference in the facilitation of fear learning by prior fear conditioning

There is now ample evidence that the strength and underlying mechanisms of memory formation can be drastically altered by prior experience. However, the prior work using rodent models on this topic has used only males as subjects, and as a result, we do know whether or not the effects of prior experience on subsequent learning are similar in both sexes. As a first step towards addressing this shortcoming, rats of both sexes were given auditory fear conditioning, or fear conditioning with unsignaled shocks, followed an hour or a day later by a single pairing of light and shock. Fear memory for each experience was assessed by measuring freezing behavior to the auditory cue and fear-potentiated startle to the light. Results showed that males trained with auditory fear conditioning showed facilitated learning to the subsequent visual fear conditioning session when the two training sessions were separated by one hour or one day. Females showed evidence of facilitation in rats given auditory conditioning when they were spaced by an hour but not when they were spaced by one day. Contextual fear conditioning did not support the facilitation of subsequent learning under any conditions. These results indicate that the mechanism by which prior fear conditioning facilitates subsequent learning differs between sexes, and they set the stage for mechanistic studies to understand the neurobiological basis of this sex difference.

Automated summary

There is evidence that prior experience can alter memory formation, but little is known about whether this effect is similar in both sexes. This study found that male rats trained with auditory fear conditioning showed facilitated learning to subsequent visual fear conditioning, while females only showed facilitation with a one-hour interval.