4.5 Article

Biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease in Black and/or African American Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 144-152

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2023.07.021

关键词

Amyloid-beta; Biomarkers; Black or African American; Cerebrospinal fluid; Cognition; Dementia; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mild cognitive impairment; Race; Tau

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite a higher prevalence of dementia in non-White racial groups, most dementia research focuses on non-Hispanic Whites. This study examined AD biomarker abnormalities exclusively in Black and/or African American participants, finding significant differences in biomarker presentation between clinical groups.
Majority of dementia research is conducted in non-Hispanic White participants despite a greater prevalence of dementia in other racial groups. To obtain a better understanding of biomarker presentation of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the non-Hispanic White population, this study exclusively examined AD bio-marker abnormalities in 85 Black and/or African American participants within the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Participants were classified by the ADNI into 3 clinical groups: cognitively normal, mild cognitive impairment, or dementia. Data examined included demographics, apolipoprotein E (APOE) & epsilon;4, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) A & beta;1-42, CSF total tau (t-tau), CSF phosphorylated tau (p-tau), 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and measures of cognition and function. Analyses of variance and covariance showed lower cortical thickness in 5 of 7 selected MRI regions, lower hippocampal volume, greater volume of white matter hyperintensities, lower measures of cognition and function, lower measures of CSF A & beta;1-42, and greater measures of CSF t-tau and p-tau between clinical groups. Our findings confirmed greater AD biomarker abnormalities between clinical groups in this sample.& COPY; 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据