4.7 Article

Retinal vessel segmentation via a Multi-resolution Contextual Network and adversarial learning

期刊

NEURAL NETWORKS
卷 165, 期 -, 页码 310-320

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2023.05.029

关键词

Retinal vessel segmentation; Encoder-decoder; Contextual network; Adversarial learning; Diabetic retinopathy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a computer-aided diagnosis method for retinal diseases called Multi-resolution Contextual Network (MRC-Net). It learns contextual dependencies between semantically different features by extracting multi-scale features and uses bi-directional recurrent learning to model dependencies. Moreover, it improves the performance of the segmentation network through adversarial training for foreground segmentation. The method outperforms competitive approaches in terms of Dice score and Jaccard index on three benchmark datasets.
Timely and affordable computer-aided diagnosis of retinal diseases is pivotal in precluding blindness. Accurate retinal vessel segmentation plays an important role in disease progression and diagnosis of such vision-threatening diseases. To this end, we propose a Multi-resolution Contextual Network (MRC-Net) that addresses these issues by extracting multi-scale features to learn contextual depen-dencies between semantically different features and using bi-directional recurrent learning to model former-latter and latter-former dependencies. Another key idea is training in adversarial settings for foreground segmentation improvement through optimization of the region-based scores. This novel strategy boosts the performance of the segmentation network in terms of the Dice score (and correspondingly Jaccard index) while keeping the number of trainable parameters comparatively low. We have evaluated our method on three benchmark datasets, including DRIVE, STARE, and CHASE, demonstrating its superior performance as compared with competitive approaches elsewhere in the literature.(C) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据