4.5 Article

A study of neural artistic style transfer models and architectures for Indian art styles

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/0954898X.2023.2252073

关键词

Neural style transfer; Indian art styles; Tanjore style; style transfer evaluation; image to image translation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper extensively studies neural style transfer algorithms and customizes them for Indian art styles. It analyzes various methods, from the seminal work of Gatys et al using CNNs to the state-of-the-art image-to-image translation models using GANs. Based on the results, the paper proposes a more suitable approach and custom architecture for Indian art styles, especially Tanjore paintings, and presents evaluation methods, including a proposed metric, to assess the model's results.
Neural Style Transfer (NST) has been a widely researched topic as of late enabling new forms of image manipulation. Here we perform an extensive study on NST algorithms and extend the existing methods with custom modifications for application to Indian art styles. In this paper, we aim to provide a comprehensive analysis of various methods ranging from the seminal work of Gatys et al which demonstrated the power of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) in creating artistic imagery by separating and recombining image content and style, to the state of the art image-to-image translation models which use Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) to learn the mapping between two domain of images. We observe and infer based on the results produced by the models on which one could be a more suitable approach for Indian art styles, especially Tanjore paintings which are unique compared to the Western art styles. We then propose the method which is more suitable for the domain of Indian Art style along with custom architecture which includes an enhancement and evaluation module. We then present evaluation methods, both qualitative and quantitative which includes our proposed metric, to evaluate the results produced by the model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据