4.7 Article

Characterization of water content and inspection of delamination in spruce, oak and meranti woods after pyrolysis processing using a new terahertz time-domain spectroscopy method

期刊

NDT & E INTERNATIONAL
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102938

关键词

NDT; Terahertz; Wood; Water content; Delamination

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel normalized time-domain integration method is proposed to detect the delamination of wood materials at different pyrolysis temperatures. The experimental results show the great robustness and detection efficiency of this method. It is also found that meranti is more resistant to pyrolysis and has higher structural stability compared to spruce and oak.
Wood has been widely used as a building and interior furniture decoration material due to its excellent insulation of heat and electricity, strong buffer effect on vibration, high strength, etc. Generally, wood materials should be processed by pyrolysis technique in order to improve corrosion resistance, flame retardancy, and dimensional stability. However, during pyrolysis, the main components of wood, such as cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, undergo chemical reactions causing the damage of the internal structure. With existing non-destructive evaluation methods, such as thermography and radiography, it is difficult to detect the degree of delamination within the wood due to its anisotropy physical properties and complex internal structure. In this work, a novel normalized time-domain integration method is proposed to detect the delamination of wood materials at different pyrolysis temperatures. The experimental results show the great robustness and detection efficiency of this method. Furthermore, numerical simulation and experiments are used to build the relationship between the terahertz time-domain signal and water content. Compared with spruce and oak, meranti is more resistant to pyrolysis and has higher structural stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据