4.5 Article

Lysergic acid diethylamide stimulates cardiac human H2 histamine and cardiac human 5-HT4-serotonin receptors

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00210-023-02591-6

关键词

Lysergic acid diethylamide; H-2-histamine receptor; Heart; Inotropy; Chronotropy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the effects of LSD on the heart and found that it can increase the contractile force and beating rate of the atria. These effects may be mediated by the 5-HT4 receptor and H-2 histamine receptor.
Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) is an artificial hallucinogenic drug. Thus, we hypothesized that LSD might act 5-HT4 serotonin receptors and/or H-2 histamine receptors. We studied isolated electrically stimulated left atrial preparations, spontaneously beating right atrial preparations, and spontaneously beating Langendorff-perfused hearts from transgenic mice with cardiomyocyte-specific overexpression of the human 5-HT4 receptor (5-HT4-TG) or of the H-2-histamine receptor (H-2-TG). For comparison, we used wild type littermate mice (WT). Finally, we measured isometric force of contraction in isolated electrically stimulated muscle strips from the human right atrium obtained from patients during bypass surgery. LSD (up to 10 & mu;M) concentration dependently increased force of contraction and beating rate in left or right atrial preparations from 5-HT4-TG (n = 6, p < 0.05) in 5-HT4-TG atrial preparations. The inotropic and chronotropic effects of LSD were antagonized by 10 & mu;M tropisetron in 5-HT4-TG. In contrast, LSD (10 & mu;M) increased force of contraction and beating rate in left or right atrial preparations, from H-2-TG. After pre-stimulation with cilostamide (1 & mu;M), LSD (10 & mu;M) increased force of contraction in human atrial preparations (n = 6, p < 0.05). The contractile effects of LSD in human atrial preparations could be antagonized by 10 & mu;M cimetidine and 1 & mu;M GR 125487. LSD leads to H-2-histamine receptor and 5-HT4-receptor mediated cardiac effects in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据