4.8 Article

Response of stratospheric water vapour to warming constrained by satellite observations

期刊

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
卷 16, 期 7, 页码 577-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-023-01183-6

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Future increases in stratospheric water vapour could worsen climate change and slow down ozone layer recovery. However, climate models disagree on the extent of these increases under global warming. This study provides a constrained estimate of stratospheric water vapour changes using historical observations and reveals that many climate models are inconsistent with observational evidence.
Future increases in stratospheric water vapour risk amplifying climate change and slowing down the recovery of the ozone layer. However, state-of-the-art climate models strongly disagree on the magnitude of these increases under global warming. Uncertainty primarily arises from the complex processes leading to dehydration of air during its tropical ascent into the stratosphere. Here we derive an observational constraint on this longstanding uncertainty. We use a statistical-learning approach to infer historical co-variations between the atmospheric temperature structure and tropical lower stratospheric water vapour concentrations. For climate models, we demonstrate that these historically constrained relationships are highly predictive of the water vapour response to increased atmospheric carbon dioxide. We obtain an observationally constrained range for stratospheric water vapour changes per degree of global warming of 0. 31 +/- 0.39 ppmv K-1. Across 61 climate models, we find that a large fraction of future model projections are inconsistent with observational evidence. In particular, frequently projected strong increases (>1 ppmv K-1) are highly unlikely. Our constraint represents a 50% decrease in the 95th percentile of the climate model uncertainty distribution, which has implications for surface warming, ozone recovery and the tropospheric circulation response under climate change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据