4.8 Article

Somatic SLC30A1 mutations altering zinc transporter ZnT1 cause aldosterone-producing adenomas and primary aldosteronism

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-023-01498-5

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified mutations in the SLC30A1 gene associated with PA. The mutations are located near the zinc-binding site in the coding region of SLC30A1 and may cause abnormal ion transport. PA cases with SLC30A1 mutations showed male dominance and increased levels of aldosterone and 18-oxocortisol.
Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common form of endocrine hypertension and is characterized by inappropriately elevated aldosterone production via a renin-independent mechanism. Driver somatic mutations for aldosterone excess have been found in approximately 90% of aldosterone-producing adenomas (APAs). Other causes of lateralized adrenal PA include aldosterone-producing nodules (APNs). Using next-generation sequencing, we identified recurrent in-frame deletions in SLC30A1 in four APAs and one APN (p.L51_A57del, n = 3; p.L49_L55del, n = 2). SLC30A1 encodes the ubiquitous zinc efflux transporter ZnT1 (zinc transporter 1). The identified SLC30A1 variants are situated close to the zinc-binding site (His43 and Asp47) in transmembrane domain II and probably cause abnormal ion transport. Cases of PA with SLC30A1 mutations showed male dominance and demonstrated increased aldosterone and 18- oxocortisol concentrations. Functional studies of the SLC30A151_57del variant in a doxycycline-inducible adrenal cell system revealed pathological Na+ influx. An aberrant Na+ current led to depolarization of the resting membrane potential and, thus, to the opening of voltage-gated calcium (Ca2+) channels. This resulted in an increase in cytosolic Ca2+ activity, which stimulated CYP11B2 mRNA expression and aldosterone production. Collectively, these data implicate zinc transporter alterations as a dominant driver of aldosterone excess in PA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据