4.8 Article

Adaptive preservation of orphan ribosomal proteins in chaperone-dispersed condensates

期刊

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41556-023-01253-2

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During stress, cells halt ribosome biogenesis, leading to accumulation of aggregation-prone orphan ribosomal proteins (oRPs). A study shows that these oRPs form reversible peri-nucleolar condensates recognized by Hsp70 co-chaperone Sis1/DnaJB6 during heat shock. These condensates remain in a liquid-like state through Hsp70 and its co-chaperones. Upon recovery, these condensates disperse in a Sis1- and Hsp70-dependent manner, with the oRPs being incorporated back into functional ribosomes in the cytosol.
Ribosome biogenesis is among the most resource-intensive cellular processes, with ribosomal proteins accounting for up to half of all newly synthesized proteins in eukaryotic cells. During stress, cells shut down ribosome biogenesis in part by halting rRNA synthesis, potentially leading to massive accumulation of aggregation-prone 'orphan' ribosomal proteins (oRPs). Here we show that, during heat shock in yeast and human cells, oRPs accumulate as reversible peri-nucleolar condensates recognized by the Hsp70 co-chaperone Sis1/DnaJB6. oRP condensates are liquid-like in cell-free lysate but solidify upon depletion of Sis1 or inhibition of Hsp70. When cells recover from heat shock, oRP condensates disperse in a Sis1- and Hsp70-dependent manner, and the oRP constituents are incorporated into functional ribosomes in the cytosol, enabling cells to efficiently resume growth. Preserving biomolecules in reversible condensates-like mRNAs in cytosolic stress granules and oRPs at the nucleolar periphery-may be a primary function of the Hsp70 chaperone system. Ali et al. show that, during heat shock, aggregation-prone orphan ribosomal proteins form nucleolar-associated condensates that are kept in a liquid-like and reusable state through Hsp70 and its co-chaperones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据