4.6 Article

Hypoxic and Reoxygenated Microenvironment: Stemness and Differentiation State in Glioblastoma

期刊

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 54, 期 8, 页码 6261-6272

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-016-0126-6

关键词

Cancer; Glioma; Hypoxia; Reoxygenation; C6; Cancer stem cell

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (Capes)
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary malignant brain tumor in adults. Hypoxia is a distinct feature in GBM and plays a significant role in tumor progression, resistance to treatment, and poor outcome. However, there is lack of studies relating type of cell death, status of Akt phosphorylation on Ser473, mitochondrial membrane potential, and morphological changes of tumor cells after hypoxia and reoxygenation. The rat glioma C6 cell line was exposed to oxygen deprivation (OD) in 5 % fetal bovine serum (FBS) or serum-free media followed by reoxygenation (RO). OD induced apoptosis on both 5% FBS and serum-free groups. Overall, cells on serum-free media showed more profound morphological changes than cells on 5 % FBS. Moreover, our results suggest that OD combined with absence of serum provided a favorable environment for glioblastoma dedifferentiation to cancer stem cells, since nestin, and CD133 levels increased. Reoxygenation is present in hypoxic tumors through microvessel formation and cell migration to oxygenated areas. However, few studies approach these phenomena when analyzing hypoxia. We show that RO caused morphological alterations characteristic of cells undergoing a differentiation process due to increased GFAP. In the present study, we characterized an in vitro hypoxic microenvironment associated with GBM tumors, therefore contributing with new insights for the development of therapeutics for resistant glioblastoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据