4.8 Article

Africa-specific human genetic variation near CHD1L associates with HIV-1 load

期刊

NATURE
卷 620, 期 7976, 页码 1025-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06370-4

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified a previously undescribed association signal on chromosome 1 that is specific to African populations and is associated with lower set-point viral load in individuals living with HIV-1. Experimental studies showed that the gene CHD1L, which is involved in DNA repair, may play a role in limiting HIV-1 replication.
HIV-1 remains a global health crisis(1), highlighting the need to identify new targets for therapies. Here, given the disproportionate HIV-1 burden and marked human genome diversity in Africa(2), we assessed the genetic determinants of control of set-point viral load in 3,879 people of African ancestries living with HIV-1 participating in the international collaboration for the genomics of HIV3. We identify a previously undescribed association signal on chromosome 1 where the peak variant associates with an approximately 0.3 log(10)-transformed copies per ml lower set-point viral load per minor allele copy and is specific to populations of African descent. The top associated variant is intergenic and lies between a long intergenic non-coding RNA (LINC00624) and the coding gene CHD1L, which encodes a helicase that is involved in DNA repair(4). Infection assays in iPS cell-derived macrophages and other immortalized cell lines showed increased HIV-1 replication in CHD1L-knockdown and CHD1L-knockout cells. We provide evidence from population genetic studies that Africa-specific genetic variation near CHD1L associates with HIV replication in vivo. Although experimental studies suggest that CHD1L is able to limit HIV infection in some cell types in vitro, further investigation is required to understand the mechanisms underlying our observations, including any potential indirect effects of CHD1L on HIV spread in vivo that our cell-based assays cannot recapitulate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据