4.8 Article

Natural short-lived halogens exert an indirect cooling effect on climate

期刊

NATURE
卷 618, 期 7967, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06119-z

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Observational evidence suggests that ocean-emitted short-lived halogens have a widespread presence in the global atmosphere. These compounds, both naturally emitted and anthropogenically amplified, have a significant cooling effect on Earth's radiative balance. This effect has increased since pre-industrial times and is projected to change further in the future.
Observational evidence shows the ubiquitous presence of ocean-emitted short-lived halogens in the global atmosphere(1-3). Natural emissions of these chemical compounds have been anthropogenically amplified since pre-industrial times(4-6), while, in addition, anthropogenic short-lived halocarbons are currently being emitted to the atmosphere(7,8). Despite their widespread distribution in the atmosphere, the combined impact of these species on Earth's radiative balance remains unknown. Here we show that short-lived halogens exert a substantial indirect cooling effect at present (-0.13 +/- 0.03 watts per square metre) that arises from halogen-mediated radiative perturbations of ozone (-0.24 +/- 0.02 watts per square metre), compensated by those from methane (+0.09 +/- 0.01 watts per square metre), aerosols (+0.03 +/- 0.01 watts per square metre) and stratospheric water vapour (+0.011 +/- 0.001 watts per square metre). Importantly, this substantial cooling effect has increased since 1750 by -0.05 +/- 0.03 watts per square metre (61 per cent), driven by the anthropogenic amplification of natural halogen emissions, and is projected to change further (18-31 per cent by 2100) depending on climate warming projections and socioeconomic development. We conclude that the indirect radiative effect due to short-lived halogens should now be incorporated into climate models to provide a more realistic natural baseline of Earth's climate system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据