4.8 Article

Coral reefs benefit from reduced land-sea impacts under ocean warming

期刊

NATURE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06394-w

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that reducing local human impacts can enhance the resilience and recovery of coral reefs to bleaching events. Integrated land-sea management can effectively protect coastal marine ecosystems and provide the best opportunity for coral reefs to persist in a changing climate.
Coral reef ecosystems are being fundamentally restructured by local human impacts and climate-driven marine heatwaves that trigger mass coral bleaching and mortality(1). Reducing local impacts can increase reef resistance to and recovery from bleaching(2). However, resource managers lack clear advice on targeted actions that best support coral reefs under climate change(3) and sector-based governance means most land- and sea-based management efforts remain siloed(4). Here we combine surveys of reef change with a unique 20-year time series of land-sea human impacts that encompassed an unprecedented marine heatwave in Hawai'i. Reefs with increased herbivorous fish populations and reduced land-based impacts, such as wastewater pollution and urban runoff, had positive coral cover trajectories predisturbance. These reefs also experienced a modest reduction in coral mortality following severe heat stress compared to reefs with reduced fish populations and enhanced land-based impacts. Scenario modelling indicated that simultaneously reducing land-sea human impacts results in a three- to sixfold greater probability of a reef having high reef-builder cover four years postdisturbance than if either occurred in isolation. International efforts to protect 30% of Earth's land and ocean ecosystems by 2030 are underway(5). Our results reveal that integrated land-sea management could help achieve coastal ocean conservation goals and provide coral reefs with the best opportunity to persist in our changing climate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据