4.8 Article

Temperature Dependence of the CdS Bandgap in the Extreme Confinement Regime

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 23, 期 20, 页码 9287-9294

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c02368

关键词

cadmium sulfide; magic-sized cluster; quantumdot; bandgap; temperature; extreme confinementregime

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A non-empirical equation for describing the temperature dependence of the optical bandgap of CdS, based on the Brus equation, reveals that the value of dE(g)/dT differs significantly from bulk values only within the extreme confinement (EC) regime. Both experimental and theoretical investigations of absorption spectra of CdS clusters and quantum dots show that dE(g)/dT in the EC regime is 2.5 times higher than in the strong confinement regime. Ligand sensitivities are also observed for dE(g)/dT in the case of CdS clusters. Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations and density functional theory calculations highlight thermal fluctuations as the crucial factor influencing the bandgap temperature coefficient.
A non-empirical equation describing the effect of size on the temperature dependence of the optical bandgap of CdS (dE(g)/dT) is obtained on the basis of the Brus equation. Intriguingly, we find that dE(g)/dT diverges strongly from bulk values only within the extreme confinement (EC) regime. We conducted both experimental and theoretical investigations of the absorption spectra of CdS clusters and quantum dots as a function of temperature above room temperature. Our results show that the value of dE(g)/dT obtained from absorption spectra in the EC regime is 2.5 times higher than in the strong confinement regime. Notable ligand sensitivities are also observed for dE(g)/dT in the case of CdS clusters. Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations and density functional theory calculations reveal that thermal fluctuations are the crucial factor influencing the bandgap temperature coefficient. Our results help resolve some long-standing debates regarding the dE(g)/dT behavior of semiconductor quantum dots.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据