4.8 Article

Nanoprobiotics for Remolding the Pro-inflammatory Microenvironment and Microbiome in the Treatment of Colitis

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 23, 期 18, 页码 8593-8601

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c02408

关键词

drug delivery; bacterium-basedbiotherapeutic efficacy; outer membrane vesicles (OMVs); nanoprobiotics; reactive oxygen species (ROS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inspired by the probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917, probiotic-derived outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) serve as an effective platform for treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Nanoprobiotics, encapsulating manganese dioxide nanozymes, adhere to inflamed colonic epithelium and eliminate excess reactive oxygen species, showing better therapeutic efficacy than commercial IBD chemotherapeutics.
Despite the great progress of current bacterially based biotherapeutics, their unsatisfying efficacy and underlying safety problems have limited their clinical application. Herein, inspired by probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917, probiotic-derived outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are found to serve as an effective therapeutic platform for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). To further enhance the therapeutic effect, the probiotic-derived OMV-encapsulating manganese dioxide nanozymes are constructed, named nanoprobiotics, which can adhere to inflamed colonic epithelium and eliminate intestinal excess reactive oxygen species in the murine IBD model. Moreover, combined with the anti-inflamFmatory medicine metformin, nanoprobiotics could further remold the pro-inflammatory microenvironment, improve the overall richness and diversity of the gut microbiota, and exhibit better therapeutic efficacy than commercial IBD chemotherapeutics. Importantly, insignificant overt systemic toxicity in this treatment was observed. By integrating cytokine storm calm with biotherapy, we develop a safe and effective bionanoplatform for the effective treatment of inflammation-mediated intestinal diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据