4.5 Review

New and emerging options for management of invasive fungal diseases in paediatric patients

期刊

MYCOSES
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/myc.13654

关键词

antifungal agents; children; mycoses; prevention; treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) play a crucial role in the care of paediatric patients, and it is important to have a solid understanding of available antifungal options. The development of new antifungal agents for paediatric patients is advancing, and there have been significant advancements in the prevention and treatment of IFDs.
Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) play an important role in the supportive care of paediatric patients with acute leukaemia and those undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation, and they are associated with significantly decreased overall survival rates in affected individuals. Relative to adults, children and adolescents are distinct in terms of host biology, predisposing conditions, presentation and epidemiology of fungal diseases, and in the pharmacology of antifungal agents. The paediatric development of antifungal agents has moved forward in a coordinated manner, and major advances have been made regarding concepts and recommendations for the prevention and treatment of IFDs. However, antifungal therapy is increasingly complex, and a solid knowledge of the available options is needed more than ever for successful management. This narrative review provides a summary of the paediatric development of agents that have been recently approved (anidulafungin, posaconazole) or are in advanced stages of development (isavuconazole). It also reviews the emerging evidence for the efficacy of echinocandins for prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis, presents new data on alternative dosing regimens of echinocandins and voriconazole, and provides a brief overview of new antifungal agents in clinical development that are expected to be developed for paediatric patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据