4.5 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: MicroRNA-101 inhibits the proliferation and invasion of bladder cancer cells via targeting c-FOS (Retracted article. See vol. 25, 2022)

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 2651-2656

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2016.5534

关键词

bladder cancer; microRNA-101; c-FOS; proliferation; invasion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MicroRNAs (miRs) have important roles in the parthenogenesis of malignancies. While it has been suggested that deregulation of miR-101 is involved in bladder cancer, the underlying mechanisms have remained largely elusive. The present study aimed to investigate the roles of miR-101 in the regulation of bladder cancer cell proliferation and invasion. Reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed that the expression of miR-101 was significantly reduced in the HT-1376, BIU87, T24 and 5637 several human bladder cancer cell lines compared to that in the SV-HUC-1 normal bladder epithelial cell line. Furthermore, a Targetscan search and a luciferase assay were used to identify c-FOS as a novel target of miR-101, and western blot analysis indicated that the protein expression of c-FOS was shown to be negatively regulated by miR-101 in bladder cancer T24 cells; however, c-FOS mRNA expression was not affected. In addition, plasmid-mediated overexpression of miR-101 and small hairpin RNA-mediated inhibition of c-FOS significantly inhibited the proliferation and invasive capacity of T24 cells, as indicated by an MTT and a Transwell assay, respectively. However, plasmid-mediated overexpression of c-FOS reversed the inhibitory effects of miR-101 overexpression on T24-cell proliferation and invasion. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that miR-101 inhibits the proliferation and invasion of bladder cancer cells, at least partly via targeting c-FOS, suggesting that miR-101/c-FOS signaling may represent a potential therapeutic target for bladder cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据