4.6 Article

Upgrading Pyrolytic Oil via Catalytic Co-Pyrolysis of Beechwood and Polystyrene

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28155758

关键词

co-pyrolysis; polystyrene; beech wood; Fe; Ni-ZSM-5 catalyst

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the catalytic co-pyrolysis of beech wood with polystyrene to enhance liquid oil production. Various zeolite catalysts modified with iron and/or nickel were used, and the liquid oil was analyzed for composition and quantity. The Fe/Ni-ZSM-5 catalyst exhibited the best deoxygenation capability, resulting in a high heating value liquid oil composed mainly of aromatics.
This study aims to investigate the catalytic co-pyrolysis of beech wood with polystyrene as a synergic and catalytic effect on liquid oil production. For this purpose, a tubular semi-continuous reactor under an inert nitrogen atmosphere was used. Several zeolite catalysts were modified via incipient wetness impregnation using iron and/or nickel. The liquid oil recovered was analyzed using GC-MS for the identification of the liquid products, and GC-FID was used for their quantification. The effects of catalyst type, beechwood-to-polystyrene ratio, and operating temperature were investigated. The results showed that the Fe/Ni-ZSM-5 catalyst had the best deoxygenation capability. The derived oil was mainly constituted of aromatics of about 92 wt.% for the 1:1 mixture of beechwood and polystyrene, with a remarkably high heating value of around 39 MJ/kg compared to 18 MJ/kg for beechwood-based bio-oil. The liquid oil experienced a great reduction in oxygen content of about 92% for the polystyrene-beechwood 50-50 mixture in comparison to beechwood alone. The catalytic and synergetic effects were more realized for high beechwood percentages as a 75-25 beechwood-polystyrene mix. Regarding the temperature variation between 450 and 600 & DEG;C, the catalyst seemed to deactivate faster at higher temperatures, thus constituting a quality reduction in the pyrolytic oil in high-temperature ranges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据