4.6 Article

Structural and Functional Characterization of Drosophila melanogaster a-Amylase

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28145327

关键词

& alpha;-amylase; glycoside hydrolase family 13 (GH13); crystal structure; acarbose; inhibitors; Drosophila melanogaster; adaptation; calcium binding; flexible loop; evolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insects rely on carbohydrates like starch and glycogen for energy, and α-amylases play essential roles under extreme conditions, contributing to their survival. Drosophila melanogaster α-amylase, DMA, is active over a broad temperature and pH range, and its crystal structures reveal an adaptive response to temperature variations.
Insects rely on carbohydrates such as starch and glycogen as an energy supply for growth of larvae and for longevity. In this sense a-amylases have essential roles under extreme conditions, e.g., during nutritional or temperature stress, thereby contributing to survival of the insect. This makes them interesting targets for combating insect pests. Drosophila melanogaster a-amylase, DMA, which belongs to the glycoside hydrolase family 13, sub family 15, has been studied from an evolutionary, biochemical, and structural point of view. Our studies revealed that the DMA enzyme is active over a broad temperature and pH range, which is in agreement with the fluctuating environmental changes with which the insect is confronted. Crystal structures disclosed a new nearly fully solvated metal ion, only coordinated to the protein via Gln263. This residue is only conserved in the subgroup of D. melanogaster and may thus contribute to the enzyme adaptive response to large temperature variations. Studies of the effect of plant inhibitors and the pseudo-tetrasaccharide inhibitor acarbose on DMA activity, allowed us to underline the important role of the so-called flexible loop on activity/inhibition, but also to suggest that the inhibition modes of the wheat inhibitors WI-1 and WI-3 on DMA, are likely different.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据