4.6 Article

Utilization of Phytic Acid as a Selective Depressant for Quartz Activated by Zinc Ions in Smithsonite Flotation

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28145361

关键词

smithsonite; quartz; flotation separation; zinc ions; phytic acid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the use of phytic acid as a flotation depressant to separate smithsonite from Zn2+-activated quartz. The results showed that phytic acid could selectively inhibit the flotation of Zn2+-activated quartz without affecting the flotation of smithsonite. It adsorbed onto the quartz surface, dissolved the active Zn2+, and eliminated active sites for sodium oleate adsorption.
It is difficult to separate smithsonite from quartz with metal ion activation through flotation using sodium oleate (NaOL) as the collector. The inevitable Zn2+ in the flotation process of zinc oxide ore makes the separation of smithsonite and quartz more difficult. Thus, this study investigated the use of phytic acid (PA) as a flotation depressant to separate smithsonite from Zn2+-activated quartz while utilizing sodium oleate as the collector. Microflotation tests indicated that phytic acid could selectively inhibit the flotation of Zn2+-activated quartz without affecting the flotation of smithsonite. The measured zeta potentials revealed that the existence of phytic acid hindered sodium oleate adsorption to the surface of Zn2+-activated quartz but had little influence on the adsorption of smithsonite. Zn2+ dissolution tests and scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis indicated that the phytic acid could dissolve the Zn2+ from the minerals' surfaces into the solution. In conjunction with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy results, the analysis indicated that phytic acid could adsorb onto the Zn2+-activated quartz surface and eliminate active sites for sodium oleate adsorption by dissolving the active Zn2+ from the quartz surface into the solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据