4.6 Article

In Situ Synthesis of Doped Bio-Graphenes as Effective Metal-Free Catalysts in Removal of Antibiotics: Effect of Natural Precursor on Doping, Morphology, and Catalytic Activity

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28207212

关键词

bio-graphene; natural gum; metal-free catalyst; antibiotic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green graphenes synthesized using natural precursors show good catalytic performance in antibiotic removal, with chitosan-derived graphene exhibiting the best performance.
Wastewater contaminated with antibiotics is a major environmental challenge. The oxidation process is one of the most common and effective ways to remove these pollutants. The use of metal-free, green, and inexpensive catalysts can be a good alternative to metal-containing photocatalysts in environmental applications. We developed here the green synthesis of bio-graphenes by using natural precursors (Xanthan, Chitosan, Boswellia, Tragacanth). The use of these precursors can act as templates to create 3D doped graphene structures with special morphology. Also, this method is a simple method for in situ synthesis of doped graphenes. The elements present in the natural biopolymers (N) and other elements in the natural composition (P, S) are easily placed in the graphene structure and improve the catalytic activity due to the structural defects, surface charges, increased electron transfers, and high absorption. The results have shown that the hollow cubic Chitosan-derived graphene has shown the best performance due to the doping of N, S, and P. The Boswellia-derived graphene shows the highest surface area but a lower catalytic performance, which indicates the more effective role of doping in the catalytic activity. In this mechanism, O2 dissolved in water absorbs onto the positively charged C adjacent to N dopants to create oxygenated radicals, which enables the degradation of antibiotic molecules. Light irradiation increases the amount of radicals and rate of antibiotic removal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据