4.6 Article

Influence of Post-Harvest Processing on Functional Properties of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.)

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28217386

关键词

coffee processing; antioxidants; polyphenols; caffeine; full washed; natural; anaerobic; washed-extended fermentation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coffee is a popular beverage known for its sensory properties and psychoactive effects. This study evaluated the impact of different post-harvest coffee fruit treatments on the antioxidant and psychoactive properties of Arabica coffee. The results showed that the processing method did not significantly affect the total phenolic content or antiradical activity of coffee, but differences in water content, pH, and titratable acidity may influence the sensory profile of coffee.
Coffee is one of the most popular beverages worldwide, valued for its sensory properties as well as for its psychoactive effects that are associated with caffeine content. Nevertheless, coffee also contains antioxidant substances. Therefore, it can be considered a functional beverage. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of four selected post-harvest coffee fruit treatments (natural, full washed, washed-extended fermentation, and anaerobic) on the antioxidant and psychoactive properties of Arabica coffee. Additionally, the impact of coffee processing on the selected quality parameters was checked. For this purpose, results for caffeine content, total phenolic content (TPC), DPPH assay, pH, titratable acidity, and water content were determined. The results show that natural and anaerobic processing allow the highest caffeine concentration to be retained. The selection of the processing method does not have a significant influence on the TPC or antiradical activity of coffee. The identified differences concerning water content and pH along with lack of significant discrepancies in titratable acidity may have an influence on the sensory profile of coffee.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据