4.6 Article

Electrophysiological Assessment of Newly Synthesized 2,3-Benzodiazepine Derivatives for Inhibiting the AMPA Receptor Channel

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28166067

关键词

2,3-benzodiazepine; AMPA receptor; GluA2; amino group; desensitization; antagonist

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effects of four novel 2,3-benzodiazepine derivatives on AMPA receptor subunits. The results show inhibitory activity of all four compounds against both homomeric and heteromeric subunits, with two compounds altering desensitization and deactivation rates. These findings contribute to a better understanding of AMPARs and potential 2,3-BDZ drugs.
Three major subtypes of ionotropic receptors regulate glutamatergic synaptic transmission, one of which is a-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) receptors (AMPARs). They are tetrameric, cation-permeable ionotropic glutamate receptors found across the brain. Abnormalities in AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic assembly are linked to cognitive decline and neurological diseases such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Huntington's. The present study will investigate the effects of four novel 2,3-benzodiazepine derivatives on AMPA receptor subunits by comparing their effects on synaptic responses, desensitization, and deactivation rate in human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293T) recombinant AMPAR subunits using whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology. All four 2,3-BDZ compounds showed inhibitory activity against all the homomeric and heteromeric subunits tested. While the desensitization and deactivation rates in 2,3-BDZ-1 and 2,3-BDZ-2 decreased and increased, respectively, in the other two compounds (i.e., 2,3-BDZ-3 and 2,3-BDZ-4), there was no change in the desensitization or deactivation rates. These results contribute to a better understanding of AMPARs by identifying potential 2,3-BDZ drugs that demonstrate inhibitory effects on the AMPAR subunits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据