4.6 Review

Recent Advances of Constructing Metal/Semiconductor Catalysts Designing for Photocatalytic CO2 Hydrogenation

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28155693

关键词

photocatalytic CO2 reduction; metal; semiconductor; surface plasmon resonance; photocatalysts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the development of the world economy and global industrialization, the demand for energy is increasing, leading to excessive carbon dioxide emissions. CO2 hydrogenation technology is considered a potential solution, as it can convert CO2 into valuable chemicals. Metal/semiconductor catalysts have shown good activity in carbon dioxide hydrogenation reactions and have attracted widespread attention. This review summarizes recent research on metal/semiconductor catalysts for photocatalytic CO2 hydrogenation, providing guidance for the design of highly active catalysts and looking forward to future developments.
With the development of the world economy and the rapid advancement of global industrialization, the demand for energy continues to grow. The significant consumption of fossil fuels, such as oil, coal, and natural gas, has led to excessive carbon dioxide emissions, causing global ecological problems. CO2 hydrogenation technology can convert CO2 into high-value chemicals and is considered one of the potential ways to solve the problem of CO2 emissions. Metal/semiconductor catalysts have shown good activity in carbon dioxide hydrogenation reactions and have attracted widespread attention. Therefore, we summarize the recent research on metal/semiconductor catalysts for photocatalytic CO2 hydrogenation from the design of catalysts to the structure of active sites and mechanistic investigations, and the internal mechanism of the enhanced activity is elaborated to give guidance for the design of highly active catalysts. Finally, based on a good understanding of the above issues, this review looks forward to the development of future CO2 hydrogenation catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据