4.8 Review

Brain-wide changes in excitation-inhibition balance of major depressive disorder: a systematic review of topographic patterns of GABA- and glutamatergic alterations

期刊

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
卷 28, 期 8, 页码 3257-3266

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41380-023-02193-x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The excitation-inhibition (E/I) imbalance is a significant molecular pathological feature of major depressive disorder (MDD), and altered GABA and glutamate levels have been observed in MDD patients. This systematic review of postmortem MDD brain studies found abnormal E/I balance topographies based on GABA- and glutamate-related signaling in various brain regions, providing important insight into the pathophysiology of MDD and potential therapeutic implications.
The excitation-inhibition (E/I) imbalance is an important molecular pathological feature of major depressive disorder (MDD) as altered GABA and glutamate levels have been found in multiple brain regions in patients. Healthy subjects show topographic organization of the E/I balance (EIB) across various brain regions. We here raise the question of whether such EIB topography is altered in MDD. Therefore, we systematically review the gene and protein expressions of inhibitory GABAergic and excitatory glutamatergic signaling-related molecules in postmortem MDD brain studies as proxies for EIB topography. Searches were conducted through PubMed and 45 research articles were finally included. We found: i) brain-wide GABA- and glutamatergic alterations; ii) attenuated GABAergic with enhanced glutamatergic signaling in the cortical-subcortical limbic system; iii) that GABAergic signaling is decreased in regions comprising the default mode network (DMN) while it is increased in lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC). These together demonstrate abnormal GABA- and glutamatergic signaling-based EIB topographies in MDD. This enhances our pathophysiological understanding of MDD and carries important therapeutic implications for stimulation treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据