4.8 Review

Effects of deep brain stimulation on cognitive functioning in treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41380-023-02262-1

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the impact of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on cognitive functioning in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The results showed that there were no significant differences in cognitive functioning up to 6 months of DBS, but small to moderate improvements were found in verbal memory, visual memory, attention/psychomotor speed, and executive functioning after 6-18 months of DBS. No cognitive decline was found in this meta-analysis up to 18 months of DBS in patients with TRD. However, more controlled studies are needed to validate these findings.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising intervention for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Effects on cognitive functioning are unclear since they have been studied in small samples. We aim to estimate the impact of DBS on cognitive functioning in TRD with a systematic review and meta-analyses. After systematically searching PubMed we included 10 studies which compared standardized neuropsychological tests before and after DBS or between active and sham DBS in TRD. Different random-effects meta-analyses were done for different cognitive (sub-)domains and for different follow-up time windows (<6 months, 6-18 months, and >18 months). We found no significant differences in cognitive functioning up to 6 months of DBS. After 6-18 months of DBS small to moderate improvements were found in verbal memory (Hedge's g = 0.22, 95% CI = [0.01-0.43], p = 0.04), visual memory (Hedge's g = 0.37, 95% CI = [0.03-0.71], p = 0.04), attention/psychomotor speed (Hedge's g = 0.26, 95% CI = [0.02-0.50], p = 0.04) and executive functioning (Hedge's g = 0.37, 95% CI = [0.15-0.59], p = 0.001). Not enough studies could be retrieved for a meta-analysis of effects after >18 months of DBS or for the comparison of active and sham DBS. Qualitatively, generally no differences in cognitive functioning between active and sham DBS were found. No cognitive decline was found in this meta-analysis up to 18 months of DBS in patients with TRD. Results even suggest small positive effects of DBS on cognitive functioning in TRD, although this should be interpreted with caution due to lack of controlled data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据