4.5 Article

Analysis of CD8+TCR & beta; Chain repertoire in peripheral blood of vitiligo via high-throughput sequencing

期刊

MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
卷 160, 期 -, 页码 112-120

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2023.06.009

关键词

CD8; T cell; Repertoire; Vitiligo; High-throughput sequencing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the TCRβ repertoire diversity and composition of CD8+ T cells in blood of 9 nonsegmental vitiligo patients via high-throughput sequencing. Vitiligo patients showed low TCRβ diversity with highly expanded clones. Differential usage of TRBV, the TRBJ gene, and the TRBV/TRBJ combination were observed between vitiligo patients and healthy controls. A set of TRBV/TRBJ combinations could differentiate vitiligo patients from healthy controls. This study revealed distinct TCRβ repertoires of CD8+ T cells in vitiligo and may contribute to the exploration of immune biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
Vitiligo is an autoimmune depigmentation dermatosis induced by melanocyte destruction, and CD8+ T cells play a pivotal role in melanocyte destruction. However, an accurate profile of the CD8+ T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire in vitiligo patients has not been reported, and the clonotype features of the involved CD8+ T cells remain largely unknown. This study aimed to assess the TCRll chain repertoire diversity and composition of blood in nine nonsegmental vitiligo patients via high-throughput sequencing. Vitiligo patients manifested a low TCRll repertoire diversity with highly expanded clones. Differential usage of TRBV, the TRBJ gene, and the TRBV/TRBJ combination were compared between patients with vitiligo and healthy controls. A set of TRBV/ TRBJ combinations could differentiate patients with vitiligo from healthy controls (area under the curve = 0.9383, 95% CI: 0.8167-1.00). Our study revealed distinct TCRll repertoires of CD8+ T cells in patients with vitiligo and will help explore novel immune biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for vitiligo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据