Do chromosome rearrangements fix by genetic drift or natural selection? Insights from Brenthis butterflies

Large-scale chromosome rearrangements, such as fissions and fusions, are a common feature of eukaryote evolution. They can have considerable influence on the evolution of populations, yet it remains unclear exactly how rearrangements become established and eventually fix. Rearrangements could fix by genetic drift if they are weakly deleterious or neutral, or they may instead be favoured by positive natural selection. Here, we compare genome assemblies of three closely related Brenthis butterfly species and characterize a complex history of fission and fusion rearrangements. An inferred demographic history of these species suggests that rearrangements became fixed in populations with large long-term effective size (N-e), consistent with rearrangements being selectively neutral or only very weakly underdominant. Using a recently developed analytic framework for characterizing hard selective sweeps, we find that chromosome fusions are not enriched for evidence of past sweeps compared to other regions of the genome. Nonetheless, we do infer a strong and recent selective sweep around one chromosome fusion in the B. daphne genome. Our results suggest that rearrangements in these species likely have weak absolute fitness effects and fix by genetic drift. However, one putative selective sweep raises the possibility that natural selection may sometimes play a role in the fixation of chromosome fusions.

Automated summary

Large-scale chromosome rearrangements, such as fissions and fusions, have been studied in three closely related Brenthis butterfly species. The results suggest that rearrangements are likely fixed in populations with large effective size, possibly due to being selectively neutral or weakly underdominant. While most rearrangements are fixed by genetic drift, one chromosome fusion shows evidence of recent positive natural selection.