4.1 Article

Synthesis and investigation of mixed Zn-Ni spinel nanoparticles for microwave applications

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15421406.2023.2272391

关键词

Lattice constant; magnetic properties; NiFe2O4; zinc substitution; ZnFe2O4

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Ni1-xZnxFe2O4 nanoparticles with an average diameter of 12.5 nm were successfully synthesized using the microwave-assisted urea method. The materials exhibited high saturation magnetization and low coercive force. The size of the ferrite nanoparticles synthesized by this method was smaller compared to previous co-precipitation methods. Lower treatment temperatures also resulted in higher stoichiometry and homogeneity of the materials.
Nickel ferrite solid solutions remain one of the main materials for a whole range of applications, including microwave equipment and components, the requirements for parameters and homogeneity of materials are constantly increasing. In this work, Ni1-xZnxFe2O4 nanoparticles with an average diameter of 12.5 nm were successfully synthesized by the microwave-assisted urea method. The temperature of a single-phase product formation was 400 degree celsius, which is lower compared to more common precipitation from aqueous solution methods or solid-state route. Ni1-xZnxFe2O4 materials demonstrate high saturation magnetization and low coercive force. The magnetization changes with increasing Zn concentration and reaches the maximum at x = 0.5. Also, the increase in zinc content leads to an increase in the lattice parameters. The average size of ferrite nanoparticles synthesized by the microwave-assisted urea method is smaller compared to ferrites synthesized earlier by the co-precipitation method. Also, lower treatment temperatures provide higher stoichiometry, and homogeneity of materials while magnetization difference is negligible. These research results provide a general and effective route to synthesize other nanostructures for a variety of microwave components.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据