4.5 Article

Comparative physiological, antioxidant and proteomic investigation reveal robust response to cold stress in Digitalis purpurea L

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
卷 50, 期 9, 页码 7319-7331

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-023-08635-7

关键词

Cold stress; Antioxidant enzymes; Proteomics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the response of Digitalis purpurea to cold stress in the high altitudes of the Himalayas. The findings demonstrate the plant's tolerance to low temperatures and harsh climatic conditions. Through physiological, biochemical, and proteomic analysis, the study provides insights into the molecular and physiological mechanisms of cold stress response in D. purpurea.
Background of the studyDigitalis purpurea (L) is an important medicinal plant growing at Alpine region of Himalayas and withstands low temperatures and harsh climatic conditions existing at high altitude. It serves as an ideal plant system to decipher the tolerance to cold stress (CS) in plants from high altitudes.Methods and resultsTo understand the complexity of plant response to CS, we performed a comparative physiological and biochemical study complemented with proteomics in one-month-old D. purpurea grown at 25 & DEG;C (control) and 4 & DEG;C (CS). We observed an enhanced accumulation of different osmo-protectants (glycine betaine, soluble sugar and proline) and higher transcription (mRNA levels) of various antioxidant enzymes with an increased antioxidant enzyme activity in D. purpurea when exposed to CS. Furthermore, higher concentrations of non-enzymatic antioxidants (flavonoids, phenolics) was also associated with the response to CS. Differential proteomic analysis revealed the role of various proteins primarily involved in redox reactions, protein stabilization, quinone and sterol metabolism involved in CS response in D. purpurea..ConclusionOur results provide a framework for better understanding the physiological and molecular mechanism of CS response in D. purpurea at high altitudes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据