4.7 Article

Preparation and evaluation of certified reference materials for crude protein, crude fat, and crude ash in feed

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 191, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2023.108854

关键词

Feedingstuffs; Certified reference material; Measurement uncertainty; Crude protein; Crude fat; Crude ash

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three new certified reference materials (CRMs) for crude protein, crude fat, and crude ash in animal feed were developed and characterized. The measurement methods were optimized and validated using existing CRMs. The certified values and uncertainties were determined through multiple laboratories, proving the suitability of these CRMs for evaluating quality control in feed testing laboratories.
Three new certified reference materials (CRMs) for crude protein, crude fat, and crude ash in animal feed were developed and characterized according to ISO 17034:2016 and ISO Guide 35:2017. The Kjeldahl, Soxhlet extraction, and ashing methods were employed to quantify these three components in candidate CRMs for swine feed, poultry feed, and fish feed. To improve the precision, the measurement methods were optimized on the basis of Directive 93/28/EEC, Directive 98/64/EC, and Directive 71/250/EEC and further validated using two existing CRMs (BCR-708 and BCR-709). The homogeneity, short- and long-term stability, and moisture content were evaluated. The certified values and their expanded uncertainties (k = 2.00) were determined through nine laboratories. The results for crude protein, crude fat, and crude ash were 14.7 +/- 0.4, 5.19 +/- 0.24, and 6.23 +/- 0.14% for swine feed CRM; 22.7 +/- 0.7, 5.16 +/- 0.39, and 5.74 +/- 0.18% for poultry feed CRM; and 35.6 +/- 0.9, 9.29 +/- 0.40, and 8.70 +/- 0.25% for fish feed CRM, respectively. These three CRMs have been used in the comparison of Chinese feed quality testing laboratory systems and proved suitable for evaluating quality control in laboratories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据