4.7 Article

Turn on fluorescent detection of biogenic amines in fish based on MnO2-coated and rhodamine 6G-loaded mesoporous silica nanospheres

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 190, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2023.108664

关键词

Fluorescence probe; Forster resonance energy transfer; Rapid detection technique; Aquatic product safety

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A highly sensitive fluorescence probe based on rhodamine 6G-loaded and MnO2 nanosheets-coated mesoporous silica nanospheres was developed for the detection of biogenic amines (BAs) in fish or fish products. The probe utilized R6G as an energy donor and MnO2 nanosheets as an energy acceptor. The method showed a wide linear detection range and high sensitivity, and was successfully validated using spiked fish samples, demonstrating its potential application in food safety.
Biogenic amines (BAs) in fish or fish products may render the food toxic, which allow to be used as an indication for microbial spoilage. Thus, it is crucial to construct a rapid and sensitive analytical method for detection of BAs. In this work, based on rhodamine 6G-loaded and MnO2 nanosheets-coated mesoporous silica nanospheres (MSNs), a highly sensitive fluorescence probe was designed and developed. Wherein, a signal on fluorescence was achieved by using R6G (lambda(emi): 553 nm) as an energy donor and MnO2 nanosheets as the energy acceptor. As BAs exist, diamine oxidase will catalyze BAs to generate hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which can reduce MnO2 to Mn2+, resulting with the dissociation of MnO2 nanosheets and the signal recovery of R6G. Under optimal conditions, the analytical method obtained a wide linear detection range of 10 similar to 400 nM with a detection limit of 5.97 nM (S/N = 3, n = 3). As a proof-of-application study, the analytical method was verified by spiked fish samples with recoveries of 93.97 to 101.57 % and was accurate at 95 % confidence level, indicating its good performance in detection of BAs and promising applications in food safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据