4.7 Article

NanoMIPs-based electrochemical sensors for selective detection of amphetamine

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 191, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2023.108821

关键词

nanoMIPs; Amphetamine; Electrochemical sensors; Illicit drug detection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A highly sensitive and portable electrochemical sensor based on molecularly imprinted nanoparticles (nanoMIPs) was developed for the selective determination of amphetamine in street samples. The sensor employed nanoMIPs designed to specifically recognize amphetamine, which were then synthesized using solid phase synthesis. The nanoMIPs were immobilized onto screen-printed carbon electrodes using a composite film containing chitosan, nanoMIPs, and graphene oxide. Incorporation of ferrocenylmethyl methacrylate in nanoMIPs enabled electrochemical detection, with the signal dependent on the interaction between amphetamine and nanoMIPs. The sensor exhibited high sensitivity and satisfactory recoveries when tested with street samples, and the results were validated using UPL-MS/MS.
A highly sensitive and portable electrochemical sensor based on molecularly imprinted nanoparticles (nanoMIPs) was developed. NanoMIPs were computationally designed for specific recognition of amphetamine, and then synthetized using solid phase synthesis. NanoMIPs were immobilized onto screen-printed carbon electrodes using a composite film comprising chitosan, nanoMIPs, and graphene oxide.Ferrocenylmethyl methacrylate was incorporated in nanoMIPs allowing electrochemical detection. The signal recorded for the electrochemical oxidation of ferrocene has proven to be dependent on the presence of amphetamine interacting with nanMIPs. The sensor was tested successfully with street samples, with high sensitivity and satisfactory recoveries (from 100.9% to 107.6%). These results were validated with UPL-MS/MS. The present technology is suitable for forensic applications in selective determination of amphetamine in street samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据